Advertisement
Advertisement

U.S. judge rejects AT&T bid to dismiss SEC lawsuit over leaks to analysts

By:
Reuters
Updated: Sep 8, 2022, 19:36 UTC

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Thursday rejected AT&T Inc's bid to dismiss a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit accusing it of giving some Wall Street analysts nonpublic information about the phone company's forthcoming financial results in early 2016.

The AT&T logo is seen in a store window in New York

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Thursday rejected AT&T Inc’s bid to dismiss an unusual Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit accusing the phone company of selectively leaking financial information to Wall Street analysts.

In a 129-page decision, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer in Manhattan said he found “formidable” evidence that AT&T and three investor relations executives improperly warned analysts in March and April 2016 that lower-than-expected smartphone sales would cut into overall revenue.

The SEC said this violated Regulation FD, or fair disclosure, which it adopted in 2000 to bar companies from disclosing material nonpublic information privately but not to the public, helping level the playing field for investors.

But the judge stopped short of declaring victory for the SEC, saying reasonable jurors could conclude that the executives Christopher Womack, Kent Evans and Michael Black did not intend to defraud investors.

“This case will now proceed toward trial, barring settlement,” Engelmayer wrote.

AT&T and the SEC did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In its March 2021 lawsuit, the SEC accused Dallas-based AT&T of leaking details about its smartphone business to 20 firms.

AT&T’s alleged goal was to “manage” those analysts and have them lower their revenue forecasts, so that actual results would meet the reduced forecasts and not disappoint investors who might otherwise drive its share price down.According to court papers, the selected analysts “uniformly” cut their revenue estimates by an average $1 billion, just enough for AT&T to beat the lowered consensus forecast.

Engelmayer also rejected AT&T’s claim that Regulation FD itself was unconstitutional because it infringed the company’s free speech.

The case is SEC v AT&T Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 21-01951.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Jonathan Oatis, Leslie Adler and David Gregorio)

About the Author

Reuterscontributor

Reuters, the news and media division of Thomson Reuters, is the world’s largest international multimedia news provider reaching more than one billion people every day. Reuters provides trusted business, financial, national, and international news to professionals via Thomson Reuters desktops, the world's media organizations, and directly to consumers at Reuters.com and via Reuters TV. Learn more about Thomson Reuters products:

Did you find this article useful?

Advertisement